About

Support faculty and curricular development by providing resources to enhance competency-based veterinary education.

  • Develop and deliver faculty development modules for CBVE (online or in person)
  • Develop guidelines for curricular implementation of CBVE

Organization of the Curriculum

In order to implement CBVE successfully, a transformation of both the educational and the clinical organization is required, which takes time and perseverance. Student centeredness, fostering a professional learning culture allowing the exchange of performance-relevant information, and active student participation should be the principal guidelines when designing and redesigning CBVE curricula. The following guidelines could help create a professional learning climate that aligns with longitudinal expertise development in veterinary education:

Faculty Development

Providing meaningful and effective narrative feedback after observing students鈥� performance places high demands on supervisors鈥� feedback skills (Govaerts, van de Wiel, and van der Vleuten, 2013). Therefore, faculty development programs are crucial in mitigating the challenges of competency-based education in veterinary curricula. These faculty development programs may focus on the following topics:

  • Information about using low-stakes assessment instruments should be provided to document performance-relevant information (which instrument, how applied, and when?).
  • Supervisors working within a learning environment are professionals themselves. We suggest that organizations invest in creating a culture in which supervisors are used to seek and provide feedback on their own performance.
  • Information should be provided about how supervisors鈥� feedback-giving behavior in performance evaluations is influenced by a variety of factors (Bok et al., 2016).
  • The faculty should be informed about the importance of providing high-quality, meaningful feedback on all relevant competency domains. By creating longitudinal, trustworthy relationships, supervisors would be able to follow up on their previously provided feedback and better evaluate students鈥� development over time (van der Zwet, 2014).